The Cisco AI Readiness
Index is based on a double-blind survey of 8,161 business leaders with responsibility for AI integration and deployment at organizations with 500 or more employees based across 30 markets globally. The Index uses six pillars, each with an individual weightage, to benchmark AI readiness – Strategy (15%), Infrastructure (25%), Data (20%), Governance (15%), Talent (15%), and Culture (10%).
Within these pillars, levels of readiness are assessed using a combined total of 49 indicators to determine a readiness score for each pillar, as well as an overall readiness score for the respondent’s organization. The data was organized and categorized into a level of readiness, with respondents ranked in four groups –Pacesetters, Chasers, Followers, and Laggards. These groups and their corresponding scores are pictured left in descending order.
By infosecbulletin
/ Saturday , September 14 2024
CISA issued 25 ICS advisories on September 12, 2024, detailing current security issues, vulnerabilities, and exploits in Industrial Control Systems....
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Friday , September 13 2024
Intel announced over 20 vulnerabilities in its processors and products in security advisories released on Tuesday. The chip giant has...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Friday , September 13 2024
GitLab released security updates on Wednesday to fix 17 vulnerabilities, including a critical issue that lets attackers run pipeline jobs...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Friday , September 13 2024
Fortinet confirmed a data breach after a threat actor claimed to have stolen 440GB of files from its Microsoft SharePoint...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Thursday , September 12 2024
Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In) issued a high-severity alert for android devices on September 11, 2024 highlighting the vulnerabilities...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Thursday , September 12 2024
Because of disclosing incorrect and negative data, The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) on Wednesday fined TD Bank, one of...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Thursday , September 12 2024
Bangladesh secure prestigious role-model position in the latest ITU cyber security index published by ITU. Bangladesh ranks among the top...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Thursday , September 12 2024
Threatdown Managed Detection and Response (MDR) team has discovered the RansomHub ransomware gang using a new attack method wityh two...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Wednesday , September 11 2024
India is to make 5,000 cyber commandos over the next five years to deal with cybercrimes in India, said Home...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Wednesday , September 11 2024
In August, Cybersecurity researchers identified 21 new ransomware variants that threaten indivisual and business. Cybercriminals are improving their tactics, making...
Read More
Based on this scoring system, 14% of respondents globally met the criteria for Pacesetters, with Chasers at 34%. Followers are the largest group at 48%, and Laggards the smallest group at 4%. Highlighting the vast divergence in levels of readiness, the average scores recorded for each group are Pacesetters – 93, Chasers – 72, Followers – 48, and Laggards – 24. The Cisco AI Readiness Index provides a comprehensive assessment tool for organizational leaders.
ALSO READ:
CSA Launches First Zero Trust Certification
When it comes to measurement, while an impressive 87% of respondents say their organization has a process in place to measure AI’s impact, only 41% have defined metrics for doing so. Similar numbers are seen with financial preparedness with 84% having a financial strategy to support AI deployment in place, but only 45% saying they have a long-term financial plan.
One of the key criteria under the Strategy pillar that differentiates the Pacesetters from the rest is a willingness to invest in AI. Only 27% of respondents say AI deployment has been given the highest priority for budget allocation and incremental budget funding, compared to other technological deployments. Based on the Index data, companies across the world have made strides when it comes to having an overall strategy, a clear understanding of what type of AI they want to adopt and deploy, and what outcomes they want to drive.
Yet the question remains, are they ready on other fronts that are critical to leverage the full potential of AI?