The Cisco AI Readiness
Index is based on a double-blind survey of 8,161 business leaders with responsibility for AI integration and deployment at organizations with 500 or more employees based across 30 markets globally. The Index uses six pillars, each with an individual weightage, to benchmark AI readiness – Strategy (15%), Infrastructure (25%), Data (20%), Governance (15%), Talent (15%), and Culture (10%).
Within these pillars, levels of readiness are assessed using a combined total of 49 indicators to determine a readiness score for each pillar, as well as an overall readiness score for the respondent’s organization. The data was organized and categorized into a level of readiness, with respondents ranked in four groups –Pacesetters, Chasers, Followers, and Laggards. These groups and their corresponding scores are pictured left in descending order.
By infosecbulletin
/ Saturday , October 24 2026
Cyberattacks are rising around the world, including ransomware, malware, data leaks, and hacked websites. These events show how complex and...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Friday , October 23 2026
The PHP security team shared ways to protect against a new flaw that lets someone run unwanted code on certain...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Friday , October 23 2026
Major US banks have detected unauthorized access to customer accounts by third-party AI agents, with some systems taking actions beyond...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Thursday , October 22 2026
Fortinet has urged customers to prioritize security updates for FortiOS, FortiManager, and FortiAnalyzer scheduled for October 22, 2026. The coordinated...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Wednesday , October 21 2026
Hacker offers to sell Rajasthan Government’s Department of Information Technology & Communication (DoIT&C) data in a underground forum. The threat...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Wednesday , October 21 2026
The PHP team released urgent security updates to fix PHP2Shell, two serious flaws (CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619) that let attackers run...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Wednesday , October 21 2026
US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that companies ​building data centers should pay a "dividend" to the communities ‌where...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Tuesday , October 20 2026
Ransomware groups are using a flaw in Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect VPN to get around multi-factor authentication and access corporate...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Tuesday , October 20 2026
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) ordered federal agencies to stop using DeepSeek products and remove it from all...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Monday , October 19 2026
NSA, CISA, and NIST have released security guidelines to find, control, and stop AI agents that go beyond their allowed...
Read More

Based on this scoring system, 14% of respondents globally met the criteria for Pacesetters, with Chasers at 34%. Followers are the largest group at 48%, and Laggards the smallest group at 4%. Highlighting the vast divergence in levels of readiness, the average scores recorded for each group are Pacesetters – 93, Chasers – 72, Followers – 48, and Laggards – 24. The Cisco AI Readiness Index provides a comprehensive assessment tool for organizational leaders.
ALSO READ:
CSA Launches First Zero Trust Certification
When it comes to measurement, while an impressive 87% of respondents say their organization has a process in place to measure AI’s impact, only 41% have defined metrics for doing so. Similar numbers are seen with financial preparedness with 84% having a financial strategy to support AI deployment in place, but only 45% saying they have a long-term financial plan.
One of the key criteria under the Strategy pillar that differentiates the Pacesetters from the rest is a willingness to invest in AI. Only 27% of respondents say AI deployment has been given the highest priority for budget allocation and incremental budget funding, compared to other technological deployments. Based on the Index data, companies across the world have made strides when it comes to having an overall strategy, a clear understanding of what type of AI they want to adopt and deploy, and what outcomes they want to drive.
Yet the question remains, are they ready on other fronts that are critical to leverage the full potential of AI?
