The Cisco AI Readiness
Index is based on a double-blind survey of 8,161 business leaders with responsibility for AI integration and deployment at organizations with 500 or more employees based across 30 markets globally. The Index uses six pillars, each with an individual weightage, to benchmark AI readiness – Strategy (15%), Infrastructure (25%), Data (20%), Governance (15%), Talent (15%), and Culture (10%).
Within these pillars, levels of readiness are assessed using a combined total of 49 indicators to determine a readiness score for each pillar, as well as an overall readiness score for the respondent’s organization. The data was organized and categorized into a level of readiness, with respondents ranked in four groups –Pacesetters, Chasers, Followers, and Laggards. These groups and their corresponding scores are pictured left in descending order.
By infosecbulletin
/ Friday , February 28 2025
At the Global Investors Summit 2025, Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw announced that India’s first indigenous semiconductor chip will be ready...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Thursday , February 27 2025
Cisco has warned of a critical vulnerability, CVE-2025-20111, in several Nexus switch models. This flaw could let attackers remotely crash...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Thursday , February 27 2025
GitLab has released a security advisory, urging all self-managed installations to upgrade to versions 17.9.1, 17.8.4, or 17.7.6 due to...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Thursday , February 27 2025
A China-linked botnet is targeting Microsoft 365 accounts with widespread password spraying attacks, according to a report by SecurityScorecard. A...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Wednesday , February 26 2025
A breach notification site has added millions of new passwords and email addresses obtained from infostealer malware. Troy Hunt, founder of...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Wednesday , February 26 2025
Cybersecurity researchers have discovered a campaign exploiting a remote command execution vulnerability, CVE-2023-20118, in Cisco Small Business Routers. This vulnerability...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Wednesday , February 26 2025
CISA has added two critical vulnerabilities to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, urging organizations to quickly patch their systems to...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Tuesday , February 25 2025
A new cyber campaign called GitVenom poses a serious risk to developers. Security researchers found over 200 fake GitHub repositories...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Tuesday , February 25 2025
Residents of Dubai can now easily renew their visas with the new AI-powered digital platform launched by the General Directorate...
Read More
By infosecbulletin
/ Tuesday , February 25 2025
CVE-2024-20953 is a vulnerability in Oracle Agile PLM, a product lifecycle management tool. With a CVSS score of 8.8, it...
Read More
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f36f9/f36f951d45a37cb5c7446a9c9bb359dd6ba6bc3f" alt=""
Based on this scoring system, 14% of respondents globally met the criteria for Pacesetters, with Chasers at 34%. Followers are the largest group at 48%, and Laggards the smallest group at 4%. Highlighting the vast divergence in levels of readiness, the average scores recorded for each group are Pacesetters – 93, Chasers – 72, Followers – 48, and Laggards – 24. The Cisco AI Readiness Index provides a comprehensive assessment tool for organizational leaders.
ALSO READ:
CSA Launches First Zero Trust Certification
When it comes to measurement, while an impressive 87% of respondents say their organization has a process in place to measure AI’s impact, only 41% have defined metrics for doing so. Similar numbers are seen with financial preparedness with 84% having a financial strategy to support AI deployment in place, but only 45% saying they have a long-term financial plan.
One of the key criteria under the Strategy pillar that differentiates the Pacesetters from the rest is a willingness to invest in AI. Only 27% of respondents say AI deployment has been given the highest priority for budget allocation and incremental budget funding, compared to other technological deployments. Based on the Index data, companies across the world have made strides when it comes to having an overall strategy, a clear understanding of what type of AI they want to adopt and deploy, and what outcomes they want to drive.
Yet the question remains, are they ready on other fronts that are critical to leverage the full potential of AI?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ff6a/7ff6aa51e72b1a5d75dc312bec61f21a80090bc6" alt=""